Astrid Fontenelle comete gafe ao rebater Hillary Clinton sobre vitória do namorado de Taylor Swift

Hillary Clinton fez uma piada e a apresentadora rebateu

© Divulgação / Notícias ao Minuto Brasil / POR FOLHAPRESS / POR SRS

FAMA REDES SOCIAIS

SÃO PAULO, SP (FOLHAPRESS) – Astrid Fontenelle está causando repercussão em uma publicação de Hillary Clinton no Instagram. A política americana fez uma piada ao parabenizar a vitória do time do namorado de Taylor Swift no Super Bowl, no último domingo (11).

“Parabéns ao namorado de Taylor. E a todos os fãs do Kansas City Chiefs”, escreveu ela. No entanto, a apresentadora brasileira rebateu que o atleta tem um nome. “O que? Namorado da Taylor? Travis Kelse [sic] é o nome correto.”

Brasileiros e estrangeiros então explicaram a Astrid que a fala de Hillary é uma piada com o fato de a cantora ser mais famosa que ele, e uma crítica a maneira como mulheres são geralmente retratadas. Os comentários ainda alertaram a brasileira que o correto é Kelce.

“Taylor é muito maior internacionalmente do que toda a NFL”, escreveu Jessie DuBois. “É porque eles se referem às mulheres sempre como esposas ou namoradas de alguém. Ela concorreu à presidência duas vezes e até hoje se referem a ela como a mulher do Bill Clinton. Como boa feminista que é, mandou a letra bem”, comentou o perfil de Danny Bastos.

Você não pensou que a Hillary não sabe disso? É chamado de humor”, falou o perfil que se identifica como Rachel Vaugh.

3.515 thoughts on “Astrid Fontenelle comete gafe ao rebater Hillary Clinton sobre vitória do namorado de Taylor Swift

  1. So — have been messing about with this thing for about four months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so thought I’d write something up since a mate asked me a few days back. Am UK based, generally do football and horses, a fiver here and there, for context.

    What got me on it was actually pretty stupid — I could never figure out what an ew payout actually came to when the place terms changed. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. These days I type the odds in before every slip, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator is the one I use most — type in the price and your stake and it shows returns straight away, either odds format. There’s also the fiddly ones — trebles returns, lucky 15s, yankees, and that’s where I always lose track. If you want a look, it’s here what is super heinz bet and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    The thing that really made a difference were the nerdier bits. The probability calculator that shows how much the bookie’s taking, and there’s the kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are terrifying. Dutching calculator is decent if I’m covering two or three runners.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its layout is pretty plain — not much frills, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s usable although the lucky 63 breakdown make you pinch and zoom. And nothing on the app store, just the site — slight shame just flagging it.

    So yeah. Costs nowt, barely any ads, works. If anyone even now adds it up in their head, give it a go — saved me plenty of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  2. So — been on this thing for something like a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d chuck my thoughts in since someone asked me last week. Am based in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    The reason I started using it was genuinely embarrassing — I never could get my head round what an e/w return would be when the place terms changed. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. Now I punch the numbers in before every slip, even a simple single bet.

    The single bet calculator is the part I’m on daily — you drop in your stake, the odds and you get the return instantly, fractions or decimals. There’s also the multiples — trebles maths, lucky 15s, a yankee, which is where most people I know lose track. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here acca odds and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that genuinely shifted things for me was the geekier bits. The odds-to-probability converter which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. Dutching calculator gets used a fair bit when I’m splitting a race.

    Not all sunshine though. Its interface feels very functional, let’s say — no flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it’s fine but the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. And nothing on the app store, it’s browser only — slight shame just flagging it.

    Anyway. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, works. If you honestly does the maths on paper, try it — it’s saved me a load of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *